![]() ![]() I'm sure that some experienced Buddipole users might disagree with me. ![]() It's simpler to put up, has good performance and in my opinion, it's quicker to deploy. ![]() However, like a lot of people do, I ended up using the components as a vertical. With various angles and other factors, you can get interesting results, just like Scott mentions in his book. I don't have anything against using it as a regular dipole. But, I figured that since I had it, I might as well start using the Buddipole components I had accumulated. They are proven performers with great SWR and resistance once initially tuned up. For a while, I must admit, I thought about giving up and using my LNR Precision Par EndFedz antennas. A few issues are that not everyone understands the dynamics of how antennas work, or how to make minute adjustments on a Buddipole that you just can't get set right. Having played with my Buddipole for a couple of years now, a few things are important to know, in my opinion. The different bands perform differently at various heights, the chart is for set certain lengths of the arms, and other little nuances you discover as you read documentation and use the antenna. I thought I would share some tidbits with you.Ī lot of the information can be quite confusing, even to experienced hams. Did it enlighten you and help you get your antenna working great, or did you come away from it feeling a bit overwhelmed and wondering if you had done yourself right by spending that much money? I'm certainly no expert on the Buddipole. Scott Anderson, NE1RD, you've already absorbed a lot of information. If you've read the various articles online or you read the book and other files by B. After many years of using Par EndFedz wire antennas for portable use, I decided to opt for a Buddipole a couple of years ago. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |